Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="wgdsr, post: 4197040, member: 7179"] if you read the first link closely, it defines what results of the rpi means. the dashes are the formulas for what counts. or is supposed to. w's and l's vs the rpi's of your opponents. not your own rpi. and that's how it is written in the rulebook (though structured better for easier reading). literally defining how they should use it. what do they do instead vs all those fancy criteria? use teams' own straight rpi. which makes the 2nd link bunk. they don't do a deep dive on anything. watch rpi. i don't have any idea how they do the women. at least as opposed to prior to 2016 or 17, coaches should know now how they're going to be evaluated and what the cut line is. [/QUOTE]