Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="NJCuse97, post: 1312478, member: 5058"] Many things potentially at play with the decision. This type of facility is not typically fire protected (too tall for the sprinklers to have much affect in a timely fashion). Once a sprinkler system came into play, could be that the city felt the underside of a platform would need to be fire protected as well and that was met with resistance as it might reduce the flexibility of any facility reconfiguration. There could be other reasoning as well, but at the end of the day, there is no platform. [/QUOTE]