Cal either paid the refs or paid the score keepers. There's always an excuse to why Kentucky is good, anybody got one?
I'd take Duke over UK on a neutral court. Krzyzewski > Calipari
Like 1996?One of those years where the very first second I get my bracket I'll just put Kentucky all the way and then figure everything else out
No chance. Okafor would struggle against Towns , Dakari and Stein and Duke barely uses their bench. UK would win by 20. Duke is the 2nd best team in the country, but UK is just on another level.I'd take Duke over UK on a neutral court. Krzyzewski > Calipari
UK very good. But, UCLA was totally beaten before they tipped off. Don't think I've ever seen a D-I team play that scared.They are scary good!
No chance. Okafor would struggle against Towns , Dakari and Stein and Duke barely uses their bench. UK would win by 20. Duke is the 2nd best team in the country, but UK is just on another level.
Clearly the UK boosters have paid all the UCLA players and coaches to throw this game. Only reasonable explanation. No way Kentucky can just be legitimately good. There must be a REASON!
Clev04 said:The guy has forfeited two final fours at two different schools, not like its a forgone conclusion. Facts are facts. The Anthony Davis rumors as well, there is a reason no one recruited him but Kentucky. Not like all this stuff is made up
Its SEC and Kentucky. Nothing new.If all rumors had some truth to them most schools would be in a lot of trouble, including ours.
The Anthony Davis rumors as well, there is a reason no one recruited him but Kentucky.