Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SUFan44, post: 1225015, member: 39"]
My question to you is this: How are we seeing kids around the country have success offensively at other schools as freshmen and sophomores at QB, while every single year we need ours to develop until they're upperclassmen for them to be any good at all? Are we that much more of a developmental school? Nunes, Anderson, Nassib et al were mediocre to bad early in their careers before getting better as upperclassmen.

Going by your argument (which in principle I agree with), we shouldn't be starting a kid until at least their redshirt sophomore year. But is that realistic in today's college landscape? Anyone worth anything wants to play right away.

I get your argument, but why is it so difficult for our program to have a three-year starter at QB? And why is it that after one of the seniors leaves who has been good, we are right back to the drawing board with an inexperienced freshman/sophomore stepping in to see if they're good enough? Gotta start blaming the coaching staffs of years past - and also of years present, as I'm not sure we're going to be in any different shape after next year and Hunt leaves.

You truly believe that after watching Wilson and Kimble over multiple games, that either of them can lead Syracuse to a bowl game? Sorry. I guess we can agree to disagree.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?