Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
King of the specious arugments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="omniorange, post: 1223903, member: 636"] True, if you have 6 or so zero or 1 loss teams like this year and last. But how often does that happen? [B][U]Zero or 1 loss teams versus 2 loss teams: [/U][/B] 2002 - 4 vs 6 2003 - 3 vs 7 [B]2004[/B] - 8 vs 7 (2 of the 1 loss teams were in non P5 conferences) 2005 - 5 vs 6 (2 of the 1 loss teams were in non P5 conferences) 2006 - 6 vs 9 (2 of the 0 or 1 loss teams were in non P5 conferences) 2007 - 3 vs 9 (1 of the o loss teams was in a non P5 conference) [B]2008[/B] - 9 vs 2 2009 - 6 vs 6 (3 of the 0-1 loss teams were in a non P5 conference) [B]2010[/B] - 9 vs 6 (3 of the 0-1 loss teams were in a non P5 conference) 2011 - 6 vs 9 (2 of the 0-1 loss teams were in a non P5 conference) 2012 - 6 vs 8 (1 of the 1 loss teams was in a non P5 conference) [B]2013[/B] - 6 vs 7 (3 of the 6 1-loss teams won their CCG, while 1 of the 2 loss teams won theirs against a 2-loss team that went to 3 losses) [B][SIZE=5]2014[/SIZE][/B] - 6 vs 2 [B][U](the perfect storm[/U][/B] for an 8 team playoff) (The notations above about non P5 conferences was added at what I consider the demarcation point of college realignment, the ACC's first raid on the Big East and then I stop mentioning non P5 conferences at the point in which their truly were now a P5 in name as well fact) Now, if the trend continues of the past two years, I believe that will be a data set point that would be a plus for the power brokers themselves to eventually expand the playoffs to 8. However, I believe they will search for data points that will give them reason to decide not to move to an 8-team playoff. And if I am correct in that belief, and what was the norm previously returns to be the norm then your point about "losing twice should knock you out of the hunt" becomes another reason not to expand to 8 - along with protecting the regular season, having the current CCG have more meaning than they would in an 8 team playoff, the question of whether or not a non P5 champion gets an auto bid, wanting the F4 to end by January 1 or 2, etc. Again, time will tell. Cheers, Neil [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
King of the specious arugments
Top
Bottom