OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 227,345
- Like
- 407,292
not sure he was a fraud other than hiding that he was doing what others were too. too bad it was a great story until it crashed down.
and intentionally tried to ruin anyone's life who tried to out him as a fraud.
I'll watch this I guess, but someone else did a doc about him a couple years ago that was quite good. Not sure how much new ground they will cover...
May have been that. I believe it was on HBO.This?
Stop at Nothing: The Lance Armstrong Story
Stop at Nothing: The Lance Armstrong Story (2014) - IMDb
You hit a lot of great points. Livestrong was an amazing fundraising campaign. No one can minimize that.Yeah I think that was the worst thing he did, once he was pretty much exposed he carried on the charade for almost another few years. Landis, Hamilton, the french reporter and the other ex teammate along with his wife pretty much had him dead to rights. On top of that he threatened and intimidated anyone who testified against him. Once Floyd Landis one the tour you know it was a complete sham. Doped to the gills. He was a middle of the road road/ and mountain bike pro for years prior.
In addition, if he quits after 3-4 they may not have gone back and tested the old urine or blood sample for EPO form years prior. Complete egomaniac. The original sample they got him on was 8-9 years old I believe, once they figured out they could test for EPO he went to straight up blood transfusions, risky to say the least. That's when Hamilton failed a test because they put somebody else's blood back in his system. Armstrong blackballed him years before he testified against Lance as well.
All that said, he was still an incredible once in a lifetime cyclist and athlete in a tremendously dirty game. It was impossible to win the tour de france without doping in that era and probably still is. He also raised a ton for cancer and did a ton with Livestrong but don't get me wrong I think the guy is one of the bigger D bags ever
You hit a lot of great points. Livestrong was an amazing fundraising campaign. No one can minimize that.
Cycling is/was an extremely dirty sport. He just happened to be the best at it. And consistently the best. It was just like the McGwire/Sosa documentary coming up on ESPN. Selig knew about it but everyone was getting filthy rich. The owners, the players, the TV networks. Everyone dug the long ball so they turned a blind eye. And Lance Armstrong made cycling an extremely popular sport as well. People would sit and watch the Tour de France. How crazy is that. But it happened. Until it got out of control. Eventually all good things come to an end. But it should be a really good watch.
You hit a lot of great points. Livestrong was an amazing fundraising campaign. No one can minimize that.
Cycling is/was an extremely dirty sport. He just happened to be the best at it. And consistently the best. It was just like the McGwire/Sosa documentary coming up on ESPN. Selig knew about it but everyone was getting filthy rich. The owners, the players, the TV networks. Everyone dug the long ball so they turned a blind eye. And Lance Armstrong made cycling an extremely popular sport as well. People would sit and watch the Tour de France. How crazy is that. But it happened. Until it got out of control. Eventually all good things come to an end. But it should be a really good watch.
interesting so far.. Pretty clear after 2-3 yrs there was only one option to win and he took it as did everyone else.
In cycling if everyone is doing it then its a level field and you are compared to your equals.. And few people really compare times in cycling because so much other stiff changed too.. Interesting to hear how many people were looking for that edge so early in the sport and it was considered OK for a long time.
In MLB many juicing compared to people in that time frame but then you are trying to compare records to people from 75 yrs ago.
You don't know that.Big difference between Lance and the baseball guys is not everyone in MLB was juicing.
interesting ending. he was very controlling and protective on the sport side.. Did some great stuff on the business side. You can see he still has some anger that many gave in who also tried to prosper from the doping..
Landis clearly wanted it both ways, took it, made money, got caught, got pissed, turned evidence, got money again and lost it.
But it strange how its 50/50 of the guys who doped some are still revered and some lost most everything because of it and at the same time they all are admitting they did it.
I was surprised it really spent almost no time on the actual racing aspects of it, the work effort, training, money spent on support and bikes etc..