Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Scooch, post: 1443763, member: 628"] Agreed, but people should be able to understand the underlying concept of sample sizes. I mean, a bad analogy is that you don't judge a baseball batters overall effectiveness from one game where he had 4 at bats. That's the equivalent of one kid's star rating. You judge the batter over the 600 at bats he had all season, and the multiple seasons he's played. That's the equivalent of the total star rating of a class, and multiple classes over time. [/QUOTE]