Latest projected NCAA tournament field of 68.

[Orangeyes]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...s-field-of-68/2012/02/03/gIQAXRcpmQ_blog.html

 

[memcorsu]

Thanks OE, that is a very favorable bracket. I really don't have much of a concern for any of those teams if we play to our abilities and not have a slump in the tourney. The one thing that is really similar to this year when compared to '03 is the depth of the team and ability night in and night out having the right piece to match the team we play each game. When we made the run in '03, it was a different player stepping up each night. The biggest issue we have right not is finding our stroke. We have seemed to have lost it lately. Hopefully this break will allow us to heal some nicks and bruises and let us finish strong with a 19 game streak to match our 20. Maybe we can scrimmage Obama and his squad and he can appoint a presidential order and make that W win # 20.

 

[SU2NASA]

Maybe we can scrimmage Obama and his squad and he can appoint a presidential order and make that W win # 20.

But then he'd probably take some of our points to give to a team with little points - gotta make it fair, a redistribution of points.

 

[Madbiker]

Don't want to see Wisconsin. That style of play will turn the game into a slow half court slog. Exactly the wrong type of game for us. Also it works against us to play rematches...like Florida...who have already played against the zone this year. Much better to get teams that haven't played against it before.

 

[BlueCurtain]

Don't want to see Wisconsin. That style of play will turn the game into a slow half court slog. Exactly the wrong type of game for us. Also it works against us to play rematches...like Florida...who have already played against the zone this year. Much better to get teams that haven't played against it before.

Clearly every tourney exit has been to a team that has already played us. What results in the NCAA speak to this so-called advantage? If you keep coming back to 2003 (which in itself is debatable) that's a little something called sample bias.