Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Dave85, post: 1777962, member: 3946"]
Say a player washes out of the NBA after 2 years and doesn't get that elusive second contract.  I just like the idea that the player has the opportunity to finish out their college career under scholarship.   And having more experience players would be great for the quality of CBB.

This one "fair for the players to be forced to stay two years" is the crux of the debate.  What is fair for the players may not be good for the quality of CBB.   There are many people besides myself who think 1-and-done has not resulted in a positive outcome for CBB.   It's funny how some people view fairness.  If you could require players to stay 4 years, and then out of fairness, compromise it to be 2 years.  Then it's still unfair so you then have to compromise again to 1 year.  So why not just take the players out of HS and go right into the D-League?  What does playing 1 year in CBB matter?  It seems from your point view, the whole discussion is all about 1-and-done players and the NBA.  If preserving the quality of CBB was something you valued, how would you compromise?   Or, do you believe the quality of CBB is irrelevant and there is no compromise?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?