Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="dan7800, post: 4696115, member: 4923"] [SIZE=13px]The complainant stated in his complaint that he went "looking for answers". LaQuint provided eyewitness testimony at the hearing that the complainant approached him and hit him twice before LaQuint punched him one time. The complainant did not even show up at the hearing and no evidence was produced against LaQuint other than his statements that he hit the guy. That is all SU needed apparently. SU said that nothing the other guy did mattered. All that matters is LaQuint admitted he hit the guy. Case over as far as SU is concerned. Absolutely incredible that SU has that standard.[/SIZE] To be fair “SU” is likely a few students and 2-3 out of touch profs, many of whom may have an agenda of their own. [/QUOTE]