Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Alsacs, post: 1423111, member: 652"]
The D was better than the O. Your analysis is fine, but I only made the point that the D was not great in context of nationally. It was good, but because it carried the team I was responding to the poster who was trying to make the narrative the defense was really good. When our D looks really good when you compare it to a poor offense.

I freaking hope the offense lights it up and I am a moron for doubting. I am just being a realist and not an idealist. I said 35 offensive TDs would be great and Crusty said that would still be bottom 1/3 in the ACC. However, atleast they would be almost doubling what we scored last year I would consider that successful.

As I said before Las Vegas has our O/U at 4.5 wins. They are saying we are a 4-8 or 5-7 team depending on 1 game in their analysis. I want to be optimistic but I trust Vegas opinion. I hope we win 6 games. I said in other threads I would give SS a 2 year extension with low guaranteed money.

However, if the narrative becomes anything beyond SS did a good job as DC I will call it out. As I said his job as DC was not going to get him a P5 HC job. He was hired to continue the momentum from the DM era and not to take 1 step back to take 2 steps forward.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?