Lawrinson14
Master Image Editor
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2011
- Messages
- 2,553
- Like
- 8,202
Louisville has fouled nova at least twice on every possession in this game. What a complete mockery of the sport. /rant
As Jay Bilas said "That's not a foul?"Louisville has fouled nova at least twice on every possession in this game. What a complete mockery of the sport. /rant
And let's not forget Shittsburgh!aren't we taking louisville with us?
The thing I don't understand - who does this "style" benefit?
It doesn't make the games more watchable. It's not bringing in crowds. Not upping the TV $$$.
I mean, I really don't get why it's in the interests of the NCAA to allow this.
The only thing I can figure is that the talent level is so diluted/diffused that the skill level is so shockingly horrible that thug ball hides it, but I just can't believe that to be true.
Sure, micro. I'm saying, macro, who benefits?It benefitted them when an underdog like Butler was able to play this way all the way to the Final Four. Twice.
Pitt too.How quick will louisville's starting 5 foul out in their first trip to Cameron?
Sure, micro. I'm saying, macro, who benefits?
I think you're right that the rules are in place and aren't officiated properly, but I'd really like to see the shot clock get cut down a bit. Even dropping it to 30 seconds would be a dramatic improvement. I see too many teams that don't even bother getting in to their offense on a lot of possessions until they would have already committed a shot clock violation in the NBA. That's horrible.The ty teams benefit, because it gives them a chance to win games they shouldn't. but we shouldn't really worry about talentless teams having a chance to win.
Sports need to adjust - the Devils won Stanley Cups with a neutral zone trap...but they had offensive firepower so when they created turnovers they could race down the ice and score. Then talentless expansion teams started playing the same way but without any ability to create scoring opportunities off the turnovers, so the game bogged down. which is why they changed the rules in the NHL in 2004, to open up play. The difference here is that the rules already exist, the officials just aren't calling them. The leagues and officials need to overcome the concerns about games with 80 fouls being boring, because it won't take many of them for coaches to adjust and the flow of the game to open up. in some ways the issue is easier - no need to create new rules - but in other ways getting officials and leagues to overcome their biases to address the problem is an even bigger challenge. We'll see this offseason if they're up to it.
I can't believe we'd score 39 pts. twice in a season...I'm hoping for a championship game score of like 39-37.