Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 5560399, member: 622"] That does not seem like a powerful argument especially if a court where LSU is likely to have “home field advantage.” Disclaimer: I’ve not read the filing, nor do I intend to do so. I think Cusefan is right, Kelly wants the full $54MM now or at least full NPV. LSU wants Kelly gone but is contractually able to draw out the payments though they appear to prefer to shut it down immediately. This leads me to think that the former AD was a weak negotiator and Kelly may not have a clause requiring a diligent work search/acceptance clause. Alternatively, Kelly wants the full cash with a removal of the clause. I think Kelly blinked. Who cares, he will walk away with far more money than he deserves and most people would consider it generational wealth. [/QUOTE]