Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 1690304, member: 1969"]
Comment #1 by Joe
[ATTACH=full]57614[/ATTACH]
Comment #2 by Joe
[ATTACH=full]57615[/ATTACH]

This is really inconsistent Joe at his best.  Classic Stuff.

So let's look at the analysis he made in the second comment which for some odd reason is combined.   He say Vandy is "perfectly reasonable" and Syracuse is basically a disgrace in the first comment.   [U][B]So if you think so differently about 2 teams why the hell are you combining the attributes?[/B]  [/U]But let's amuse ourselves and look how each team team did in those attributes.  Surely the team that is "perfectly reasonable" must be better in those attributes.
[LIST]
[*]First he focus on the fact that the teams were a combined 1-9 vs top 50 road teams.   I don't think many bubble teams have a great record against top 50 road teams.    Regardless,  that one win belongs to Syracuse.   ([B]Syracuse 1, Vandy 0)[/B]
[*]He then focuses on the teams combined road record of 6 wins -- both teams have 3 wins.  If you add neutral wins both teams have 5.  [B] Syracuse though has 3 top 50 wins on road / neutral court.   Vanderbilt has none.  [/B]
[*]He then combines the teams again and talks about the 6 wins against the field.   [B]Well Syracuse has 4 and Vandy has 2.[/B]
[/LIST]

So Joe?   Are you sure that Vandy is perfectly reasonable and Syracuse should not even be close?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?