Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 206351, member: 1969"] "This ain't college football" and yet you support the committee guessing what the results of games would have been in order to rank teams - totally subjective. Sounds alot like a polling system -- this ain't college football. I never said that Melo did not have any impact on the game. But what is the threshold? Does Michael Eric at Temple have an impact for the games he missed? My suspicion has always been that the committee has a very high threshold for considering results or assessing the impact of imjuries (only one I remember is Kenyon Martin and he was player of the year) . It is way too subjective, for a process that tries to be as objective as possible. And if they are acting as I suspect, I totally support it. I don't want the committee playing god with results. Take the W's and L's and go from there. Although I guess its easier to do, when the two teams debated are so visible and well known. [/QUOTE]