Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SWC75, post: 2499251, member: 289"] My second suggestion is for a 64 team tournament so I don't think revenue would be an issue there. I would think a 351 team tournament would make more money, not less. The financial thing is the reason I don't expect it to contract, unless they they go to a round-robin pool system that would produce more games to make up for the lost ones. I just get tired of the endless micro-parsing of records this time of year and the uncertainty about what will be enough and what won't. [/QUOTE]