Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="billsin01, post: 282449, member: 837"]
Fair points. I guess one counter is that I don't think breaking off the hoops onlies was going to be part of a solution to "save" the conference. I'm not saying I agree with that per se, but I think the general approach was to try and save the league as it was constituted, regardless of whether that was a fool's errand or not.
 
But my only point is that I'm not sure many know enough to say unequivocally that the leadership was abhorrent. But maybe it was. What do I know? My reaction on moving to the ACC breaks up into three parts, none of which are very popular on this board:
 
1) A massive "meh" to ACC football membership and hoops outside of Duke/UNC.
2) A sense of loss at BE hoops and the tourney in NYC.
3) A nagging suspicion that we could be aligned elsewhere or the ACC could look significantly different by 2016. I have zero information on this but just don't have any sense that there will be any loyalty to conferences that are set up with no real regional ties to begin with.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?