Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="upperdeck, post: 471978, member: 474"] I dont think down and distance is always the answer. Its more momentum of the game that matters to me. the USC game is the best example of a game where we could have taken the gamble maybe taken a lead or control and the downside was not that huge.. USC tried it early and failed and it cost them nothing. in four years what have we tried maybe one fake FG? the WV game we went for it more because of weather than anything else but i think it shows that as he trusted the team more he was more willing to open it up.. [/QUOTE]