Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cuseregular, post: 784513, member: 185"] I think this last part/paragraph is revisionist. No way in heck CTO and other higher ups react as vehemently as they did and gets as pissed off as they did when he left in the manner he did. Someone from the very top relayed the story that Hackett was literally ready to sign back here when he got the last second call from DM who, apparently, was unable to get his first or even second choices. Guy has all the right to leave, take some along with him, and we should be somewhat indebted to him for what he did here not doubt, but in the final analysis he didn't give two shites about what the potential repurcussions would be here. Those as I was told are the facts of the matter. Could I be wrong, sure, do I think I'm wrong given my connections to it all, no. [/QUOTE]