Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="cuse309, post: 2354333, member: 5119"]
Those scores I just listed aren't real scores. They were simply to show 17 point loss games and whether or not they're considered a blowout loss.
I listed 6 games in McNabbs 4 years above, that to me were blowout losses against teams that they should have competed with. I'm not saying that we, right now, are back. What I'm saying is that we have performed, despited W-L, similarly to our avg. teams in the glory years. Those teams usually won between 7-9 games. We can do that this year. Those teams competed against the elite, but never could pull of a victory over a top 10 team, we've already done that. And those teams would lose to ranked teams by 17+ points at least once a year. We haven't done that yet. Obviously the rest of the season, and next year, and next year need to be played to be back, but my suggestion in the o.p. was that based on how we have performed this year, we aren't too far off from those 90's teams. This team would beat those 90's Rutgers, Pitt, West Virginia, Boston College, Temple, teams, and split games against Va Tech, and lose badly to most of those Miami teams. They could beat the non conference teams like we did in Wisconsin, or Auburn or Michigan from back then, and lose to a National Champion Tennessee team. I feel like if this team could go back in time to the 90's it would have similar results as those 90's teams.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?