McCord

[CusefanATL]

I’ve given up hope.

 

[Todoubled23]

I finally finished catching up on like 25+ pages and I feel like I just ran in a circle full of emotions and hopes to just end up in the same spot as before.

Well done everyone.

 

[HRE Otto IV]

Why would playing 2 years of JUCO not counts towards his eligibility?

Technically the rule is 5 years to play up to 4.3 years. What Pavia is trying to argue is the 5 year clock shouldn’t start until you enter college. The NCAA is saying he played 3.0 over 5 past high school.

If Pavia wins the NCAA can only restrict you to are you a student. So Kyle can play in 2025, 2026, and beyond.

 

[DownTheField]

Why would playing 2 years of JUCO not counts towards his eligibility?

 

[RF2044]

Why would playing 2 years of JUCO not counts towards his eligibility?

Because the NCAA is arbitrary, capricious, and while the sometimes point to precedent as the basis for what they do, they equally as often deviate from precedent in a seemingly chaotic fashion when it suits them.

No idea whether McCord would have legal grounds to make an appeal, sue, or whatever. Not sure that having legal grounds matters, when the NCAA is so all over the place, and when legal actions make them pucker up.

McCord might as well roll the dice. He'd be a high profile case, and a suit would garner lots of attention in the sports media, which in and of itself might make the NCAA fold.

Again, not weighing in on whether there is legal precedent -- I honestly think that barely matters.

 

[Todoubled23]

Is that really you in the pic next to your s/n?

I wish I could tell you yes, but it's not me.

It's even better. The man, the myth, the legend. Chaz Owens.

 

[pokercuse08]

He played in JUCO and is saying that shouldn't count. Not really comparable with Kyle's situation.

Not apples to apples, but they can make it all go away by making it five to play five and saying JUCO counts. It's the obvious strategic move for the NCAA imo.

 

[dasher]

Prediction:
1) NCAA grants McCord a 5th year.
2) Dart gets another year of eligibility somehow and transfers to be our backup. Because, D.A.R.T.
3) We win the whole damn thing.
4) NCAA retroactively declares McCord ineligible and revokes our Championship.
5) Autry gets a 5 year extension.

Another guy who made me laugh today

 

[RandomGuy]

Because the NCAA is arbitrary, capricious, and while the sometimes point to precedent as the basis for what they do, they equally as often deviate from precedent in a seemingly chaotic fashion when it suits them.

No idea whether McCord would have legal grounds to make an appeal, sue, or whatever. Not sure that having legal grounds matters, when the NCAA is so all over the place, and when legal actions make them pucker up.

McCord might as well roll the dice. He'd be a high profile case, and a suit would garner lots of attention in the sports media, which in and of itself might make the NCAA fold.

Again, not weighing in on whether there is legal precedent -- I honestly think that barely matters.

NIL and back pay rulings have changed everything.

Can Day's mismanagement (as he's admitted), cost a player X$ in NIL? I think not. Those are real, quantifiable damages. No fault of the subordinate, that HAD to listen to his boss. Damages.

 

[vegasnick]

I like the Prediction IDEA...let me take a swing at it:
1) McCord gets his 5th Year
2) Either Williams Transfers in the second portal window or ONE of Williams

Because the NCAA is arbitrary, capricious, and while the sometimes point to precedent as the basis for what they do, they equally as often deviate from precedent in a seemingly chaotic fashion when it suits them.

No idea whether McCord would have legal grounds to make an appeal, sue, or whatever. Not sure that having legal grounds matters, when the NCAA is so all over the place, and when legal actions make them pucker up.

McCord might as well roll the dice. He'd be a high profile case, and a suit would garner lots of attention in the sports media, which in and of itself might make the NCAA fold.

Again, not weighing in on whether there is legal precedent -- I honestly think that barely matters.

this

 

[rrlbees]

They are hoping to hear next week. At least one well connected person at the DART event thinks the odds might be as good as 50/50.

 

[Orangeman]

They are hoping to hear next week. At least one well connected person at the DART event thinks the odds might be as good as 50/50.

Awaiting orders as a dutiful soldier should

May have watched the Key Plays on YouTubeTV of the Miami Game again. Maybe

 

[Cuse12]

They are hoping to hear next week. At least one well connected person at the DART event thinks the odds might be as good as 50/50.

Let’s keep this rolling. This thread another week? Sign. Me. Up.

 

[AZOrange]

I am old-47

I hate you

 

[AZOrange]

I hate you

If you tell me you played for Pool I will smash you

 

[oldpinepoint]

If you tell me you played for Pool I will smash you

Are you talking to yourself or me? I played for Marcellus

 

[AZOrange]

Are you talking to yourself or me? I played for Marcellus

Lucky…

 

[USMCSnyper]

49

 

[Bulldog04]

Pena coming back next year. Maybe he knows something?

 

[Cusefan69]

Let’s keep this rolling. This thread another week? Sign. Me. Up.

 

[CuseBlood44]

Let’s keep this rolling. This thread another week? Sign. Me. Up.

The Christmas 2024 McCord thread is gonna end up better than Thanksgiving 2023 Mullen

 

[richmondcuse03]

Pena coming back next year. Maybe he knows something?

He wanted to come back either way. This just means we took care of him.

 

[Jake]

He wanted to come back either way. This just means we took care of him.

Huge having him back next year.

 

[Nick44]

Huge having him back next year.

I can’t decide who was the more pleasant surprise this year. Pena or Meeks? I guess I’ll say Pena but both were studs.

 

[CusefanATL]

They are hoping to hear next week. At least one well connected person at the DART event thinks the odds might be as good as 50/50.

The hope I had given up is creeping back in.