Shrmdougluvr
Give it all to me fool!
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 6,633
- Like
- 12,075
I understand that. The answer could be because they are colleges where kids earn credits transferable to bachelor or higher degree bearing institutions. Rules were initially made to manage kids seeking college degrees. “Student athletes.”The JUCO wasn’t the level of competition. It was the inconsistent (arbitrary) way they treated post high school, pre-four year school, competition. Prep school didn’t count. Junior hockey didn’t count. Pro sports (Chris Weinke) didn’t count. Why should JUCO?
The “level of competition” reference I am making is that the JUCO Pavia went to often completed with prep schools, high schools, etc, so there is, as you note, inconsistency in treatment there. That actually makes sense to me.
I wonder if the NCAA would have caved as quickly if Pavia attended one of the Juco’s in Kansas or Mississippi?