Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="llandz, post: 1426327, member: 1679"] I think a suspension, if there is such a thing, is in order. I think we invoke a 3 strikes rule here. First time was dumb. Second time shows maybe there is more to this and it is time to face up to the facts. In other words, there should be no third time. He is still one of ours, and I think there are issues at play here. Make a statement that he is suspended pending getting the appropriate help he needs, and then a period of time that he stays out of trouble. This embarrasses him and lets him know that this is not ok for an SU trustee, but also we do not throw our own under the bus so quickly. We will stand behind him while he gets help. One last chance. Period. I am not condoning any DUIs, just sometimes there is more to it than meets the eye. [/QUOTE]