Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="pfister1, post: 76782, member: 285"] Its not a contradiction of the Grand Jury Presentment. The Grand Jury wasn't investigating McQueary's actions so their report may not have had reason to detail McQueary's actions specifically. Remember what everyone has seen is not testimony, its a summary report of what the Grand Jury felt happened based on the testimony it received. Could be that what McQueary actually did or said didn't make it into the Presentment because (i) he wasn't asked the right question/given an opportunity to give that testimony - remember it wasn't his actions that the Grand Jury was investigating or (ii) whoever drew up the Presentment didn't find it relevant to the charges which centered on Sandusky's conduct and the failure to report by Curley and Shultz. See Point #3 in this article. [url]http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/michael_mccann/11/15/sandusky.legal/index.html#ixzz1doCzmYpu[/url] [/QUOTE]