Are the Miami Heat the future of NBA defense?
The Heat’s defense is great. It’s revolutionary, too.
www.sbnation.com
With a versatile center, can we do something like this?
Are the Miami Heat the future of NBA defense?
The Heat’s defense is great. It’s revolutionary, too.www.sbnation.com
With a versatile center, can we do something like this?
Also helps to have nba level talent.With an NBA 3pt line and a 24 second clock? Absolutely. Both of which I feel are overdue. Bring the college rules more in line with the NBA to better prepare kids that have a shot at the league
Also helps to have nba level talent.
So, no, Syracuse can’t do something like that right now
All-time great.Remember, an NBA court is bigger.
Of course, it wasn’t 50 years. JB used to play man, with 2-3 on In Bounds under the basket. 1996 was the tipping point.50 years of Zone - more than enough for me. We need to move on. If somebody else, somewhere else can execute an efficient Zone D - kudos to them, but I am sick and tired of the Zone and want no part of it other than for a couple of odd possessions here and there to mix things up.
Ok, so do you need another 23 years of zone to be ready to move on ???Of course, it wasn’t 50 years. JB used to play man, with 2-3 on In Bounds under the basket. 1996 was the tipping point.
Remember, guys, zone defense can’t defend 3’s. When 3 point shooting teams play against m2m they miss 100% of their 3’s 100% of the time.
I feel like we have the personnel next year to use both aggressive man and aggressive zone configurations. Plus the coaches with the experience to teach both. Red would be smart to employ this two headed monster on occasion. It could make us really unique.Are the Miami Heat the future of NBA defense?
The Heat’s defense is great. It’s revolutionary, too.www.sbnation.com
With a versatile center, can we do something like this?
I feel like we have the personnel next year to use both aggressive man and aggressive zone configurations. Plus the coaches with the experience to teach both. Red would be smart to employ this two headed monster on occasion. It could make us really unique.
What do you take that from my post? The OP to which I replied was woefully inaccurate.Ok, so do you need another 23 years of zone to be ready to move on ???
and, yes, i even remember some man in the 2003 run.
We don’t go on any run in 2003 without it. Everyone remembers Oklahoma, but there would be no regional final vs Oklahoma without ditching the zone vs Ok St. …and we aren’t in Albany as a 3 seed if we didn’t use man in 2 of our biggest regular season wins.Ok, so do you need another 23 years of zone to be ready to move on ???
and, yes, i even remember some man in the 2003 run.
Yes, that is why I have been mystified for 20 years that Jimmy totally dropped M2M when it enabled his finest hour. Makes no sense to me.We don’t go on any run in 2003 without it. Everyone remembers Oklahoma, but there would be no regional final vs Oklahoma without ditching the zone vs Ok St. …and we aren’t in Albany as a 3 seed if we didn’t use man in 2 of our biggest regular season wins.
I'd love to see 'Cuse implement a full-court trapping defense. Run & Gun, baby!50 years of Zone - more than enough for me. We need to move on. If somebody else, somewhere else can execute an efficient Zone D - kudos to them, but I am sick and tired of the Zone and want no part of it other than for a couple of odd possessions here and there to mix things up.
This^^^We don’t go on any run in 2003 without it. Everyone remembers Oklahoma, but there would be no regional final vs Oklahoma without ditching the zone vs Ok St. …and we aren’t in Albany as a 3 seed if we didn’t use man in 2 of our biggest regular season wins.
Kind of like Carnasecca with the 'Bush.50 years of Zone - more than enough for me. We need to move on. If somebody else, somewhere else can execute an efficient Zone D - kudos to them, but I am sick and tired of the Zone and want no part of it other than for a couple of odd possessions here and there to mix things up.