Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Melancer46, post: 1055975, member: 1674"] Yeah, rebounding, assists, blocks, and steals I believe are the areas that generally translate to the NBA. That's probably one of the reasons teams that follow these analytics aren't as high on him though. He rebounds well, but his steals and blocks rates are just scary bad, and he's a poor passer as well. He also only shot 46% from 2 point range in SEC play despite being a man amongst boys. He's earily similar to Thomas Robinson in a lot of ways, but worse in just about every way (granted that Robinson was a year older when he entered the draft and was a junior, but still). Edit: There's a pretty good read about Randle's defense here: [url]http://deanondraft.com/2014/04/25/visibility-bias-and-julius-randles-defense/[/url] DeanOnDraft is a great resource for getting a more in-depth look at some of the prospects. He does a really nice job of fleshing some of their numbers out. [/QUOTE]