who cares about michiganjust as all you kids want want to put 44 BACK into the rotation. :crazy: :noidea:
Oh Lord
who cares about michigan
uniforms...traditions, football, etc...M.You should put yourself on an hour's probation for posting about Meeechigan.
they just broke traditionuniforms...traditions, football, etc...M.
just figured id throw a 44 discussion into a day filled with uniform fun.
Cuse will NEVER have anyone EVER worthy of wearing 44 again, so it should be retired.
save ourselves the embarrassment of giving it to someone shlitty.
but if it wasnt retired, was never given out but the thought of it being given out kept all the kids here warm and fuzzy into thinking they would get someone worthy of it...then well, whatever.
teams and schools should chant 1998 at us for not having anyone worthy of it since that year.
althought you could make the argument that they should chant 1966.
uniforms...traditions, football, etc...M.
just figured id throw a 44 discussion into a day filled with uniform fun.
Cuse will NEVER have anyone EVER worthy of wearing 44 again, so it should be retired.
save ourselves the embarrassment of giving it to someone shlitty.
but if it wasnt retired, was never given out but the thought of it being given out kept all the kids here warm and fuzzy into thinking they would get someone worthy of it...then well, whatever.
teams and schools should chant 1998 at us for not having anyone worthy of it since that year.
althought you could make the argument that they should chant 1966.
ehh, 3 did.they just broke tradition
our tradition was that lots of good players wore 44. some of us like that tradition. our little hollywood bozo knew better.
ehh, 3 did.
i we are arguing over the definition of good...then add 1 more (konrad, and ill listen to debates on owens for 1 more)
then i totally missed the point.The whole freakin' tradition of #44 was that it was an active number.
That there was a lineage.
Who cares if Terry Richardson wasn't as good as Jim Brown? That wasn't the GD point.
Oh, and Michigan sucks.
KaiserUEO said:then i totally missed the point. and still dont get it. i dont want the #44 disrepected. apparently, you guys are ok with it. if it was given to a proven Jr or Sr as a # switch reward...then fine. otherwise, keep it in the rafters.
then i totally missed the point.
and still dont get it.
i dont want the #44 disrepected.
apparently, you guys are ok with it.
if it was given to a proven Jr or Sr as a # switch reward...then fine.
otherwise, keep it in the rafters.
my point is, the "Tradition of 44" is a pretty weak story.Yeah, you missed the point. I'm confused as to how to deal with this admission of fallibility, but I'll get by somehow.
i'm going to chalk up your posts here to sleep deprivationmy point is, the "Tradition of 44" is a pretty weak story.
from 1889-2005 a whopping 25 guys have worn it.
3 guys have worn it magnificently.
starting with the Legendary Jim Brown.
after him in 1954, 10 guys.
10 in 50 years.
2 'magnificently'.
keep it in the rafters so tv folk can talk about its significance.
there is no Tradition, the Legend is the story.
25 guys spanning 42 years.i'm going to chalk up your posts here to sleep deprivation
3 guys wearing a number magnificently means something!
25 guys wore it for much more than 25 years.
if your criteria is magnificence, well of course, it's not that much of a tradition. what in the world is magnificent all the time?
i don't think very good players wearing 44 tarnishes those who were magnificent25 guys spanning 42 years.
and if 3 wore it magnifcently, why do you guys want to tarnish that...instead of Champion that??
44 should be everywhere, seen everywhere, spoken about everywhere...just not on the field of the play gaining 1 yd for every 3 carries so we can all oohh and ahhh and spin the yarn.
or reward it to an upper classman...at all positions.
i think just the OL is disqualified, they can get fancy in getting a QB eligible for it.
The whole freakin' tradition of #44 was that it was an active number.
That there was a lineage.
Who cares if Terry Richardson wasn't as good as Jim Brown? That wasn't the GD point.
Oh, and Michigan sucks.
my point is, the "Tradition of 44" is a pretty weak story.
i get it.And yet that was exactly the story that made #44 an iconic number.
The phone exchanges on The Hill were changed to 443 while #44 was active. And every game I ever watched on TV in the '90s showed Richardson and Konrad, then talked about the legendary status of the number and the unique tradition of it being active, not retired.
The whole freakin' story is about Brown passing the number down to Davis, and then Davis passing it down to Little.
KaiserUEO said:i get it. i love it. i use '44' in a whole bunch of things. just dont see why it should be active. 44 is still talked about in every game. being active is not what makes it all those things.