Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="RF2044, post: 5366427, member: 40"] I would just caveat your first sentence by emphasizing the RIGHT coach, not just a new coach. Which is why it will be vitally important to emphasize merit-based criteria if / when Red is replaced, and conduct proper due diligence to identify the best candidate from a group of coaches with a proven track record -- instead of emphasizing "nice to have" criteria over more relevant, job-related criteria. Coaching is performance based. When you hire someone unqualified to a big time, P4 role -- you reap what you sow in terms of the ensuring results. As this ~20 loss season / our abysmal KenPom and NET ratings demonstrate. If we want to right the ship, then both the AD and the University need to take a completely different approach and get serious the next time around, instead of worrying about Hop, GMac, etc. and artificially constraining the pool of candidates. [/QUOTE]