Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Orangepace, post: 2137061, member: 322"] This is simply not true... Happens in the corporate world more often than you think. Typically, it's done with more protection for the Corporation (ie.. Non-compete, and/or non-raid clauses), but I've seen it done in two separate instances when a Corporation was involved in leadership transition planning. In both instances, it was done in an effort to provide the appearance of stability to revenue sources, while a better suited replacement was sourced and put into place. The penalty is usually substantial enough to retain the "interim" employee, keeping them on the staff, but provides no assurances the full-time position will be theirs. [/QUOTE]