Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Zelda Zonk, post: 4064425, member: 966"] I like to discuss concepts and argue logic, yes. If you need to decide and maintain that a topic isn’t ‘complicated,’ and can’t/won’t adjust your perspective when presented with reasoning and questions that contradict your attitude and thoughts, that’s your prerogative, I suppose, but it’s not as virtuous as you seem to think it is. Not sure why [I]your[/I] ‘argument‘ continues to cite facts that are already conceded and are irrelevant to the actual disagreement. Or why you ignore the questions that [I]are[/I] relevant. [What difference does SU’s record make? And where did you get the ’definition’ that includes the “particularly before they get their own first head coaching job?” ….Never mind.] Talk about tilting at windmills—you’re the one continuing to argue the point that Pitino was an assistant for us. Where has that ever been in dispute? If that’s not an imaginary enemy, I don’t understand your application of the idiom. [/QUOTE]