Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OrangeDW, post: 1037304, member: 2458"] I loved the 2010 team, but I really can't see them as #1. 2003 went 30-5 and won it all, featured 3 of our all time greats. How can they not be #1? I, like many others, believe we would've won it in 2010 with AO. But...we still shou;d've beaten Butler. I know Joseph got suplexed, I know that fluke 3 bounced around and somehow went in...but we SUCKED. All game. Still should've won, regardless and didn't. 1989 is clearly(IMO) our most talented and winning 30games(same as 2010) and making the elite 8(further than 2010) in a much tougher era puts them at #2. 1. 2003 2. 1989 3. 2010 4. 2012 5. 1996 6. 1990 7. 1991 8. 1994 9. 2000 10. 2013 11. 2009 12. 1998 13. 2004 14. 2005 15. 1995 16. 2014 17. 1992 18. 2011 19. 1993 20. 2001 21. 1999 22. 2007 23. 2006 24. 2002 25. 1997 26. 2008 [/QUOTE]