Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="OttoMets, post: 1037498, member: 716"]
I think 1992 and 1990 are also arguable (actually, they all are).

2005 and 2013 kind of had mirror-image seasons, one had a very good regular season, excellent Big East Tournament, and poor NCAA; the other had a mediocre regular season, excellent Big East Tournament, and very good NCAA.

I think I've got a bias for regular season success (and, honestly, a bias for 2005, a team that looked forward to for 18 months, only to see an incredible start go down in a blaze of disappointing player development and a kind of raw deal in terms of seeding and placement). There's also some eye test in here, which is why, for example, 1995 is so high and 2014 is so low, despite very different records.

EDIT: Glancing at it again, I'd certainly place 2013 above 1998. If Janulis doesn't hit the prayer against Iona and/or Burgan gets called for the travel against St. John's, we'd remember that team very differently. As it stands, they were decent but not clearly better than 2013.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?