Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Alsacs, post: 3407420, member: 652"] They are paying basically the same amount they would in their original 82 game proposal. They just lowered the amount of games they want to pay to 50 instead of 82 games because the players weren’t going to agree to lower than salaries by what the original 82 game proposal called for. The owners said okay fine we will pay you your full prorated salaries we just won’t play 82 games so we won’t have to pay you more money since 50’games will result in the same salaries being paid. All the owners did was chop 32 games off losses of their ledger to get the same salaries. It’s an insult to the fans for a 50 game season just because owners who are billionaires won’t take a one year hit and just make the money back from owning their teams for as long as they want too. [/QUOTE]