Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 1997109, member: 1969"]
First, I completely agree that our program is not performing and that our season is not great.

Of course you are moving the posts.   You moved them again in your latest reply

1.  Pearl brought up Monmouth win as it is a team we may want to track.

2.  You said that Monmouth is not really good.

3.  I said that they had a decent chance of being a top 50 RPI win, so it would be deemed as a quality win by the committee and they are a tea, worth tracking

4.  You then totally ignored that it would be a top 50 win and moved the goal posts in the following way
a) Stated that our program should not need wins against Monmouth (Which I agree with but is totally irrelevant to why we are tracking Monmouth)
b) You then stated they had no top 100 wins (OK - that does not disqualify them from being a top 50 win)

5.  I then stated you are moving the goal posts

6.   You said no, then decided to move the goal posts again by stating that our 2 best wins were Monmouth and Holy Cross, and that we were spinning those wins as good.

In response to your latest moving of the goal posts in #6
a) No one is claiming that Holy Cross is any good or getting overly excited about our OOC resume, so you are spinning the discussion into areas that we are not even arguing.
b) All we are showing is that Monmouth may still be a quality win in the end (top 50 RPI or close to it).  And then you create false narratives like a) above that we are not even agreeing with.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?