Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="GoSU96, post: 3511535, member: 114"]
How is evaluating actual performance, regardless of efficiency, in the context of that programs historical performance irrelevant.

Given the crawl, walk, run paradigm I don't really GAF about efficiency at this point.   That's more a function of talent then design.    If we haven't seen with our own eyes what these guys can do your objection might be relevant.

Should the offense be more consistent and efficient, absolutely, but saying it's a failure because of stat boy metrics in a vacuum without taking into account where this program has been and the constraints it is under is absurd.

And the original point is when looking at the issues with the program, the offensive approach should be the last thing to worry about.     The relative talent level across various coaches has been pretty consistent and Babers has managed to consistently generate more yards and points than his predecessors.   That's a good thing and the first thing that needed to be done.   It doesn't matter to me how they got it done to this point.

I can't believe anyone would argue that Baber's offense is no better than Shafer's because of efficiency reasons.  Good lord.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?