Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SoBeCuse, post: 16857, member: 796"]
This is a very good post and the others are good too in this thread. I predicted 38-6 SC and just finished watching my DVR of it due to a concert I had to play. Like you say, SU did not roll over. They were not intimidated, played hard, and executed pretty well with the horses they have. They just don't have enough talent. No deep threat, no shifty receivers. Provo and Lemon can't be your best option in the passing game. Don't understand why the youngsters don't get more run. What's the love affair with Graham, anyways? Gotta develop a compliment to Bailey. Preferably AAM. Gulley is ok but he is another small guy. We are lucky to have Nassib.  I thought the OLine played pretty darn well.  Nobody could get open except for the dink'n dunks and on late game Kiffin Cover 2 scheme.  Really need WR playmakers in space and down the field...on EVERY down snaps and not just gimmick or blown coverage plays!  The defense performed as well as they could've minus CJones and too much time on the field. Still, Barkley had too much time back there. I was impressed how they did a pretty good job on the SC running game until garbage time.

Woods is so fluid. NICE player. Barkley was on point. They always have good FBs and Rhett Ellison is another good one. I am happy that SU was reasonably competitive in a match where the talent gap from an offensive standpoint was glaring.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?