Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
My Take
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Archbold44, post: 5488586, member: 10528"] 1987, the team went 11-0 and was not in the best bowl because of the bowl tie-ins and 3 undefeated teams, two of which had the perception of tougher schedules. In all those years since... in NO other season has our schedule mattered meaningfully--in a good way. If/when we play a difficult schedule, it either ends up not mattering or we do it to our own detriment. If we play a light schedule, it does not end up mattering much either. Last year, we had the perception of a light schedule. But, if we had subbed out the Ohio win for a Michigan neutral game loss... do you think we would have gotten to a better bowl??? Nope. Most seasons, it just does not matter. The other issue is team development. In 2012, we had a very tough schedule. One FCS opponent. 7 Big East games. Northwestern (H), USC (N), Minnesota (A), and Missouri (A). Nassib had to play every game, all game. Hunt did not get much work in at all. Did that not impact 2013? Which, by the way, was also hampered with a Penn State game opener in Game 1. Our choices were big-time program transfer Allen or hardly any experience at all Hunt--who gave us the best chance to win? Meanwhile, Hunt came in against Wagner and Tulane... moving the football. He got to find himself against reasonable opponents. Is there a happy medium? I think more seasons than not, we are better starting off with a manageable opponent in Week 1. And then week 2 play a P4 that you have some Week 1 tape on. Duke/Illinois are doing that. Obviously, you cannot manage that perfectly every year. I still say, however, that so long as we are in THIS version of the ACC, no need to schedule an SEC team for an opener and Notre Dame. If we knew we had Tennessee lined up several years ago, why not work with Notre Dame to get them in a different year? At least switch the H/A so that we get them at home this year. We do not need 6 A/N games in ANY year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
My Take
Top
Bottom