Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="kingottoiii, post: 344292"]
I disagree with that. The 4th Q was different but the first 3 Qs were very much the same as last year passing wise. Lots of short passes to TEs and WRs into the flats. Sure we did it at a faster pace. And we had a different run game. But overall we didn't have results that were all that great, especially since we were playing such a poor D.
 
The first drive we were in FG range to start and got conservative. The 2nd drive we benefited from a broken play on 3rd down. The 3rd drive we went 3 and out. The 4th drive was a typical long drive for a TD. The 5th drive was short due to an INT. The 6th drive was a 3 and out. The 7th drive was short due to a fumble. The 8th drive was a 3 and out where we had great field position. The 9th drive was cut short due to the lateral. The 10th drive we moved the ball then got conservative and missed a FG. The 10th drive was a typical long scoring drive. The rest of the game we opened it up more throwing a lot more intermediate and long passes. 
 
So with the score 35-20 we had 354 yards at 5.1 yards per play in 44:13 of game play. The rest of the game we had 262 yards at 9.4 yards per play scoring 21 points in 15:47 of game play. That includes the last drive which was ugly. Let's not rewrite what happened. We can all look at the game thread and see that the O was getting cursed at pretty much until the Kobena TD to end the 3rd Q. 
 
BTW can we stop the Stevens is one of the best players posts on this board please. IMO Wales is a better passing threat. In the coaches opinion Stevens is not a big enough weapon to start. He is a good player and not having he certainly hurts but he is not one of our best O players.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?