Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
My two cents, having now seen the team
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="billsin01, post: 2374135, member: 837"] I'm not arguing against either of the main points in this post but I think the staff needs to start changing the narrative on this thing for three reasons: -- I defy anyone to watch an NBA game and tell me that the main component of a good defense is the one-on-one isolated matchups. It's literally like 15% of what teams do. It's a constant series of switches and the best defensive teams excel at scrambling and secondary/tertiary slides. Those are all principals of the zone and, well, any defense a team plays. Yes, the best defenders give teams problems in individual matchups and the defense is still obviously m2m, but I honestly find it absurd to suggest that playing man defense at Duke truly prepares a guy for defense in the nba. -- For a kid who's talented enough to go to the NBA, defense is effort. There are a million examples of this, college and pro. The one that pops into my head is kyrie irving. Terrible defender, then played really solid defense against an incredibly dangerous team in the 15-16 finals. Then he struggled again defensively all of last year, including the finals. Now he's in boston and he's been really solid defensively. Same player, a stretch of just over two seasons and he's been considered a good defender twice and a bad defender twice. I mean, you can only draw one conclusion. -- For the vast majority of real NBA prospects they're in college for a max of two years. Are we to believe those two years of zone -- played against the toughest conference in college basketball and routinely the most nba talent of any conference in america -- is going to undo whatever m2m skills they acquired in grade school/high school/aau? That's completely illogical. I don't know, I just think we have to stop letting others dictate this conversation and point to draft record and the style of defense played in the NBA and making the case that not only is the zone not a bad defense, it's something that could pay dividends at the next level. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
My two cents, having now seen the team
Top
Bottom