Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="jsshap, post: 214604, member: 1459"]
All I have read is the article and the 16 page thread below, so I dont have a lot of substantive thoughts on this new issue. But I was really surprised by all of the "bfd it's only weed" themed posts and (to a lesser extent) the posts about how this is only a su policy not an NCAA one.   I think Moqui made this point 4x but many seem to miss it...it's not a question of whether pot is a big deal.   It would not matter if the su policy said you must use a blue pen rather than a black pen in your finals and if you use a black pen you are ineligible.   Ineligible is ineligible. So while I get (sort of) the vitriolic reaction of many, I am surprised there is apparently such little disdain for the possibility that someone in school admin knowingly looked other way at ineligible status.    Sure the timing is not coincidental, but that alone does not mean it's not harmful.   And I am glad to see those far more knowledgeable than me think this will not be significant, but I think that those who summarily dismiss it for above reasons are being a bit short sighted.  Masons comment seems spot on - if the report is accurate much depends on the who.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?