Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="fanfanclubclub, post: 420425, member: 787"] You are correct, 33rd, not 39th. I was wrong on that one. So yes, 33rd is solidly top 50 in pure passing numbers, but again, this is only qualified passers, not including Pashall, Garnder, and other better QBs who have played shorter seasons. Braxton Miller and other dual threats are also far more efficient overall QBs. And a large number of backups are known to be better than Nassib right now, like Christian Lemay, just as pro scouts knew that Nick Florence and Brett Hundley were better than Nassib last year. Nassib is still not a top 50 college QB, as he misses the mark by more than 6 spots. But I was wrong, 33rd is better than 39th, and it's fairly significant. No way to spin it, I had the numbers wrong. Arguing whether the cut off for "barely top 50" is 39, or 43, is semantics however. [/QUOTE]