Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Horn88, post: 2896019, member: 7087"] I was thinking the same but wasn't sure if I was crazy for thinking it was too much for a guy like AD. Lonzo and Ingram are both still really, really young and it's not like they're bad players. They just aren't these no brainer all stars yet like some people expected but that doesn't mean they won't continue to develop and get better. Ingram is still only 21 and just averaged 19, 6 and 4 for the month of January while LeBron was out. As you said, it wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing for the Lakers to have LeBron, cap space to go after another piece or two this offseason and then still have all those young guys to develop and get better as opposed to an aging LeBron, AD and then a roster of vet minimums which would be the case if they have to take back Hill's contract. I really think next year the NBA opens up quite a bit when/if Durant leaves Golden State. [/QUOTE]