Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Melancer46, post: 3461002, member: 1674"] There’s nothing questionable about the overturn. The fact that it was originally called a charge is further proof of how rusty the refs are. The goaltend was clearly a goaltend. Other refs missed the same call in the Portland game too. As for the Theis play, the ref’s explanation is that he saw Theis keeled over and decided to take a look and determined nothing out of the ordinary had happened. I think it’s probably BS, but by the letter of the law, the play shouldn’t have been reviewed at all because it wasn’t called a foul on the floor and you can’t review for a foul or flagrant foul if no foul was called. I tend to think it was correctly ruled a no-call but that one admittedly could have gone either way and I wouldn’t have put up a fight. [/QUOTE]