Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Horn88, post: 2948590, member: 7087"] Impact won't be nearly as dramatic as you lay out. What's the difference between several powerhouses dominating the recruiting rankings now? It can't really get any more further down that end of the spectrum than it already is. Kids will still factor in location of school, relationship with coaches, playing time, player development, etc. just like they do now and teams can still compete without a roster full of 5 stars just like they do now. Also, the idea that local boosters and alumni have this infinite pool of money to spend on their favorite college sports team isn't realistic. They already earmark the funds they want to spend on their favorite programs and I don't see a material increase in that. The only difference will be that some of it goes directly to the player without having to be masked or layered and not 100% to the school. It's insane the current model has been able to hold up as long as it has. [/QUOTE]