Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="javadoc, post: 81503, member: 338"]
Well there you go.  19.01.2 is the catch-all "you are teaching impressionable youngsters and your morals must be exemplary."  10.1 is the "ethical conduct" section which at least includes a bulleted list of actual transgressions.  They have to be going for (a) and/or (d), which relate to withholding information from the NCAA or the school when an investigation is occurring.

The institutional control one could be easy.  From the manual:

"6.01 GENERAL PRINCIPLE
6.01.1 Institutional Control. The control and responsibility for the conduct of intercollegiate athletics shall
be exercised by the institution itself and by the conference(s), if any, of which it is a member. Administrative control
or faculty control, or a combination of the two, shall constitute institutional control.
6.1 INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE
6.1.1 President or Chancellor. A member institution’s president or chancellor has ultimate responsibility
and final authority for the conduct of the intercollegiate athletics program and the actions of any board in control
of that program. (Revised: 3/8/06)"

By 6.1.1, since the Board had to remove the president, you have instant loss of institutional control right there.  If that is not enough, then an indictment for perjury against your AD should suffice.

Penn State is gonna get it.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?