Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 4219168, member: 1969"]
Let's start with your questions

1) How or what determines a good OOC win, if in reality the conference or teams in it were overrated to begin with
"Good Wins - Wins over Tourney Teams in the top 12 seed lines (or last 4 teams out)".  Its the exact same criteria for all 5 conferences and they all had nearly equal opportunity to get quality wins.

2)  Saying the SEC had 21 good wins?
- The list is below.  I don't make up stuff or ignore stuff.

3) Against the Big Ten?  
Some of them against BIG tournament teams.   Yes.   Just like every other conference had the same opportunity.

4) Against Non Tourney ACC Teams?
Why would they count.   They are not good wins.  Might be some of their bad losses however.

5) How is that metric determined?

Good Wins - Wins over Tourney Teams in the top 12 seed lines (or last 4 teams out). (Basically only teams that would get in as at large's or be very close)
Bad Losses - Q3 or Q4 losses as defined by the NCAA committee.

All the conferences had similar opportunity to fail or excel.

Here is the data

The table again as a reminder.   Although when I scrubbed the ACC this morning, they were actually 6-16.   I had included a loss at Western Kentucky as a bad loss.
[IMG]https://syracusefan.com/attachments/1648273921578-png.215922/[/IMG]

[ATTACH type="full"]215932[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH type="full"]215933[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?