Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 3126723, member: 622"] The article is pie in the sky, not really based in legal analysis with a pro-payment slant. While I agree that players should be able to earn money, that is my opinion, not legal analysis. The reality is that one law cannot force a person to break another law. Though the writer tries to make a point, he fails to make a substantive point when addressing conflicting laws; stealing to pay bills does not involve conflicting laws. Juxtaposed with Title IX mandating equal treatment and this ruling. The concept that an advisory opinion is going to let schools pay more to male athletes in a time when women are closing the payroll gap but still behind is not going to fly politically. Such an opinion would all but force Congress to "fix" the system. [/QUOTE]