Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Eric15, post: 5103295, member: 676"] 0307 my friend, in fairness, haven't you done that a few times in this thread? In Post #7 you wrote "Pitt made it as a 12 seed at 17-12 in 1985 and lost by 24 in its opener. BC was 18-10. This year they would have been lucky to make the NIT with those records." Those cherry picked teams and records are meaningless without context. We don't know their SOS, RPI, quality wins, bad losses, etc. 10-loss teams sometimes miss the tournament and sometimes they're as high as a 3 seed. In Post #49 you wrote "If UVA was so good they should have beat us in 2016." Again, that doesn't really mean anything. UVA was clearly better than us that year, and literally every other year we've been in the ACC (we are 3-13 against them). We rode 6-7 magical minutes of Malachi to a fantastic upset win. Richmond wasn't "better" than us in 1991, they just were better at that one moment in time. [/QUOTE]