Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Chip, post: 458091, member: 19"] I was more just responding to why no one was adding Rutgers back in 2003. I don't think it's as good an idea now, for the reasons you cite. But it sounded like a much worse idea back in 2003. 40-50,000 people showing up at a home game is a lot better than 20,000 (did they even get 20,000 back then? I was at the SU-RU 2003 game, and I swear there were no more than 1,000 people in their seats as they announced their seniors). Adding Rutgers in 2003 would be like adding Temple now. Adding Rutgers in 2012 is slightly better. I still don't really get it though. I think the B1G is cooking some serious books when it comes to their forecasted Big 10 network revenues. [/QUOTE]