Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="rrlbees, post: 1487156, member: 96"] I'm looking for trouble? I didn't even respond to your post. I responded to SWC's post where he found the line in the paper at 25 after he had said it was 28. So I responded to HiM, not YOU, about me getting 25 and that it wasn't 28. His finding it the paper confirmed what I remembered as the "line". That's why I replied to him since he had mentioned both. Had nothing to even do with you or anyone else's posts or memory. But you decided to jump on my post and reply to me. Look in the mirror. [/QUOTE]